![]() ![]() And after reboot, my problem had disappeared ! So the solution was either "wide symlinks" or "unix extensions". (The referenced smb.conf is the server's one). Just give a path of the symbolic link to the stat command and thats it. This is what worked for me edit the section of /etc/samba/smb.conf this way (correct or add the missing lines): Does anybody know a way to fix this, or where I should look to find an answer (or at least better diagnose. restart samba on the server ( /etc/init.d/samba restart ) mount the folders again on the client. The only way to restore these symlinks is to : unmount the folders on the client. This time, I added the instructions of this reply () ( ) : The problem is that the symlinks aren't 'followed' anymore. Quite funny, I had already read that thread when I first tried to mount my folders, and consequently I had :Īdded this parameter in the folder share definition in smb.conf :Įcho "0" > /proc/fs/cifs/Linu圎xtensionsEnabledīut this apparently was not enough, hence this post. In the absence of anything else it's got to be worth a try though. That said, it's strange that it works with a mount cycle (and Samba restart). ![]() Restart samba on the server ( /etc/init.d/samba restart )ĭoes anybody know a way to fix this, or where I should look to find an answer (or at least better diagnose my problem) ? Code: Share Definitions video1 comment 2.5Video1share path /srv/samba/content/path follow symlinks yes wide links yes unix extensions no By default, the home directories are exported read-only. The only way to restore these symlinks is to : This is done by bitwise ORing these bits onto the mode bits of a file that is. Default: follow symlinks yes force create mode (S) This parameter specifies a set of UNIX mode bit permissions that will always be set on a file created by Samba. The problem is that the symlinks aren't "followed" anymore. It currently recognizes Samba (Samba), the Linux CIFS file system (CIFSFS), OS/2, (OS2), Mac. ![]() server/private/ /media/server-private smbfs credentials=/etc/smbmountlogin,iocharset=utf8 0 0Īfter restarting my client, the connection is successful, and I can access my two folders /media/server-public and /media/server-private. This should guard against problems like people holding down Ctrl-C or the filesystem filling up between the rm and cp commands (thus preventing even the new ln from working). server/public/ /media/server-public smbfs credentials=/etc/smbmountlogin,iocharset=utf8 0 0 When a client tries to open a symbolic link on a Samba server share, Samba attempts to follow the link to find the real file and let the client open it, as if the user were on a Unix machine. An even more robust method for handling symlink failures is to cp to a temporary file in the same directory then mv -f that temporary file into the original. For this to work, I added this line to each folder shared in /etc/samba/smb.conf :Īll this working very well, I decided to add these folders to /etc/fstab on the client : These folders are actually folders where I put symbolic links targeting the real folders I want to share. I have a server and a client, and on the server I share two folders (public and private). I have a problem with samba shares and symbolic links. c:1298( check_reduced_ name)Ĭheck_ reduced_ name: Bad access attempt: branches is a symlink to foo/barĬheck_ reduced_ name: Bad access attempt. Attempts to access existing files or directories at this level produce error 59 (An unexpected network error occured). creating `\\srv\ share\foo\ bar` ends up with error 50 (The request is not supported). `\\srv\share\foo`, but I can't create any files or directories inside it, e.g. Warning: Enabling the follow symlinks option can be a security risk. Set the following parameter in /etc/samba/smb.conf under the global settings. I can create a directory in `\\srv\share`, e.g. I would appreciate any help in seeing the linux symlinks in the windows side. But I cannot manage to see it from windows. The issue is that access to anything under a direct subdirectory of the share doesn't work. Whenever I create a symlink in the linux side, I expect it to be seen from the windows side (as it happens for example in a server with samba). Allowing symlinks on one of the affected shares mitigates the issue for that share. The affected shares have `follow symlinks = no` the ones with `follow symlinks = yes` aren't affected AFAICT. follow symlinksyes create mask0744 directory mask0755 wide links no unix extensions no min protocolNT1 securityuser local masterno realm passdb backendsmbpasswd printingcups max protocolSMB3 winbind enum usersyes load. 14.04.6, some of my shares broke in a curious way. I set up a Samba server with Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu on Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, and created a share. After upgrading to 4.3.11+ dfsg-0ubuntu0. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |